UNDT/2012/207, Bairam
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
Jurisdiction: The Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over this SOA in light of the fact that the Applicant had received a response to his request for management evaluation prior to the filing of his application. Thus, the contested administrative decision was no longer the subject of an ongoing management evaluation as required under art. 2 of the Statute.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant sought suspension of the decision not to renew his appointment beyond 31 December 2012 on the grounds that the contested decision was arbitrary and improperly motivated. He argued that the retrenchment exercise UNAMI based its decision on was flawed.
Legal Principle(s)
N/A
Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable
Applicants/Appellants
Bairam
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law