51Թ

UNDT/2016/014

UNDT/2016/014, Guzman

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that her separation upon the expiry of her contract was not the subject matter of the Application before it. Damages for moral injury – As held by UNAT in Asariotis, damages for moral injury may arise in two situations: first, for a fundamental breach of the employee’s substantive entitlements arising from his or her contract, and/or from a breach of procedural due process entitlements; secondly, where the employee has produced evidence of harm, stress or anxiety caused by the breach.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

On 15 December 2013, the Applicant filed an Application challenging her “unlawful separation based on the alibi of post abolishment; separation from service pending completion of ePAS rebuttal”. She also filed a Motion for Interim Measures Pending Proceedings which was granted. Her separation was subsequently withdrawn by the Administration. The Applicant was then separated at the expiration of her contract following a reclassification of her P-4 post to P-5.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Guzman
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law