51Թ

S/RES/1329

  • S/RES/1325
  • S/RES/1329
  • S/RES/1503
  • S/RES/1528
  • S/RES/1534
  • S/RES/1757
  • S/RES/1978
  • S/RES/1996
  • S/RES/1997
  • S/RES/2066
  • S/RES/2348
  • S/RES/2429
  • S/RES/2463
  • S/RES/955
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    2019-UNAT-921, Mindua

    UNAT held that the Appellant was not a staff member, as he was not supported by the Secretary-General in terms of Staff Regulation 4. 1 and was not subject to the Secretary-General’s authority, but rather he was elected by the General Assembly. UNAT held that UNDT did not err in dismissing the application as not receivable ratione personae. UNAT held that UNDT correctly distinguished ILOAT judgment No. 3359, noting that the ILOAT’s jurisdiction ratione personae is broader than UNDT’s jurisdiction, in that it may be invoked by “officials”, which includes judges. Noting that the current...