51³Ô¹Ï

A/RES/53/253

  • 10th - 1955
  • 11th - 1956
  • 13th - 1958
  • A/RES/1/13
  • A/RES/13(I)
  • A/RES/217 (III)
  • A/RES/22(I)A
  • A/RES/258/III
  • A/RES/2688(XXV)
  • A/RES/3042(XXVII)
  • A/RES/31/126
  • A/RES/31/240
  • A/RES/32/253
  • A/RES/33/142
  • A/RES/33/143
  • A/RES/3357(XXIX)
  • A/RES/35/210
  • A/RES/37/126
  • A/RES/39/246
  • A/RES/39/27
  • A/RES/43/226
  • A/RES/44/198
  • A/RES/45/259
  • A/RES/470-V
  • A/RES/48/218
  • A/RES/48/218B
  • A/RES/49/241
  • A/RES/50/11
  • A/RES/51/217
  • A/RES/51/226
  • A/RES/51/241
  • A/RES/51/243
  • A/RES/52/234
  • A/RES/53/221
  • A/RES/53/253
  • A/RES/54/244
  • A/RES/55/159
  • A/RES/55/232
  • A/RES/55/258
  • A/RES/57/226
  • A/RES/57/305
  • A/RES/58/254
  • A/RES/59/272
  • A/RES/59/283
  • A/RES/59/287
  • A/RES/59/289
  • A/RES/59/296
  • A/RES/594(VI)
  • A/RES/61/240
  • A/RES/61/244
  • A/RES/61/251
  • A/RES/61/261
  • A/RES/61/262
  • A/RES/61/822
  • A/RES/62/228
  • A/RES/62/253
  • A/RES/62/63
  • A/RES/63/228
  • A/RES/63/250
  • A/RES/63/250/Paragraph 23
  • A/RES/63/252
  • A/RES/63/253
  • A/RES/63/259
  • A/RES/64/110
  • A/RES/64/233
  • A/RES/64/269
  • A/RES/64/289
  • A/RES/65/247
  • A/RES/65/247/Paragraph 50
  • A/RES/65/248
  • A/Res/66/106
  • A/RES/66/237
  • A/RES/66/264
  • A/RES/67/241
  • A/RES/67/257
  • A/RES/68/253
  • A/RES/68/254
  • A/RES/68/268
  • A/RES/68/291
  • A/RES/69/203
  • A/RES/69/204
  • A/RES/69/251
  • A/RES/69/302
  • A/RES/70/112
  • A/RES/70/170
  • A/RES/70/244
  • A/RES/71/263
  • A/RES/71/266
  • A/RES/72/254
  • A/RES/72/255
  • A/RES/72/290
  • A/RES/73/236
  • A/RES/73/276
  • A/RES/73/278
  • A/RES/73/315
  • A/RES/74/255
  • A/RES/74/255A-B
  • A/RES/74/263
  • A/RES/75/248
  • A/RES/76(I)
  • A/RES/76/242
  • A/RES/77/114
  • A/RES/77/260
  • A/RES/973(X)
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    UNDT/2009/052, Rosca

    Transferred JAB cases are governed by the UNDT Statute. Decisions of the Administrative Tribunal on exceptional circumstances are wrong and should not be followed. Ignorance of the law held not relevant. Where the UNDT Statute is ambiguous, interpretation should preserve rights and uphold justice so far as the language permits. Outcome: The appeal was submitted within time and is receivable.